Free Access
Issue
Reprod. Nutr. Dev.
Volume 46, Number 6, November-December 2006
Page(s) 657 - 661
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2006039
Published online 15 December 2006
References of  Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 46 (2006) 657-661
  1. Chemineau P. Possibilities for using bucks to stimulate ovarian and oestrous cycles in anovulatory goats. A review. Livest Prod Sci 1987, 17: 135-147 [CrossRef].
  2. Ungerfeld R, Forsberg M, Rubianes E. Overview of the response of anoestrous ewes to the ram effect. Reprod Fertil Develop 2004, 16: 479-490.
  3. Walkden-Brown SW, Martin GB, Restall BJ. Role of male-female interaction in regulating reproduction in sheep and goats. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1999, 52: 243-257.
  4. Lassoued N, Khaldi G. Influence du niveau alimentaire avant et après la mise bas sur la réponse des brebis de race Barbarine à l'effet mâle. Ann INRAT Tunisie 1990, 63: 1-16.
  5. Thimonier J, Cognie Y, Lassoued N, Khaldi G. L'effet mâle chez les ovins : une technique actuelle de maîtrise de la reproduction. INRA Prod Anim 2000, 13: 223-231.
  6. Mellado M, Vera A, Loera H, Reproductive performance of crossbred goats in good or poor body condition exposed to bucks before breeding. Small Rum Res 1994, 14: 45-48.
  7. Delgadillo JA, Fitz-Rodríguez G, Duarte G, Véliz FG, Carrillo E, Flores JA, Vielma J, Hernandez H, Malpaux B. Management of photoperiod to control caprine reproduction in the subtropics. Reprod Fertil Develop 2004, 16: 471-478.
  8. Véliz FG, Moreno S, Duarte G, Vielma J, Chemineau P, Poindron P, Malpaux B, Delgadillo JA. Male effect in seasonally anovulatory lactating goats depends on presence of sexually active bucks, but not estrus females. Anim Reprod Sci 2002, 72: 197-207 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  9. Véliz FG, Poindron P, Malpaux B, Delgadillo JA. Maintaining contact with bucks does not induce refractoriness to the male effect in seasonally anestrous female goats. Anim Reprod Sci 2006, 92: 300-309 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  10. Terqui M, Thimonier J. Nouvelle méthode radio-immulogique rapide pour l'estimation du niveau de progestérone plasmatique. Application pour le diagnostic précoce de la gestation chez la brebis et la chèvre. C R Acad Sci Paris, 1974, D279: 1109-1112.
  11. Delgadillo JA, Canedo GA, Chemineau P, Guillaume D, Malpaux B. Evidence for an annual reproductive rhythm independent of food availability in male Creole goats in subtropical northern Mexico. Theriogenology 1999, 52: 727-737 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  12. Mauléon P, Dauzier L. Variations de la durée de l'anoestrus de lactation chez les brebis de race Ile-de-France. Ann Biol Anim Biochem Biophys 1965, 5: 131-143.
  13. Wright PJ, Geytenbeek PE, Clarke IJ. The influence of nutrient status of post-partum ewes on ovarian cyclicity and on the oestrous and ovulatory responses to ram introduction. Anim Reprod Sci 1990, 23: 293-303 [CrossRef].
  14. Martin GB, Rodger J, Blache D. Nutritional and environmental effects on reproduction in small ruminants. Reprod Fertil Dev 2004, 16: 491-501 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  15. Masteller MA, Bailey JA. Agonistic behavior among mountain goats foraging in winter. Can J Zool 1988, 66: 2585-2588.
  16. Barroso FG, Alados CL, Boza J. Social hierarchy in the domestic goat: effect on food habits and production. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2000, 69: 35-53 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  17. Álvarez L, Martin GB, Galindo F, Zarco LA. Social dominance of female goats affects their response to the male effect. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003, 84: 119-126 [CrossRef].