Free Access
Reprod. Nutr. Dev.
Volume 45, Number 1, January-February 2005
Page(s) 29 - 37
References of Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 45 29-37
  1. Mazur P. Freezing of living cells: mechanisms and implications. Am J Physiol 1984, 247: 125-142.
  2. Hammadeh ME, Szarvasy D, Zeginiadou T, Rosenbaum P, Georg T, Schmidt W. Evaluation of cryoinjury of spermatozoa after slow (programmed biological freezer) or rapid (liquid nitrogen vapour) freeze-thawing techniques. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001, 18: 364-370.
  3. Yu I, Songsasen N, Godke RA, Leibo SP. Differences among dogs in response of their spermatozoa to cryopreservation using various cooling and warming rates. Cryobiology 2002, 44: 62-78.
  4. Rota A, Ström B, Linde-Forsberg C, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Effects of Equex STM Paste on viability of frozen-thawed dog spermatozoa during in vitro incubation at 38 °C. Theriogenology 1997, 47: 1093-1101.
  5. Burgess CM, Bredl JC, Plummer JM, England GC. Vital and ultrastructural changes in dog spermatozoa during cryopreservation. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 2001, 57: 357-363.
  6. Peña A, Linde-Forsberg C. Effects of Equex, one- or two-step dilution, and two freezing and thawing rates on post-thaw survival of dog spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2000, 54: 859-875 [CrossRef].
  7. Neild D, Chaves G, Flores M, Mora N, Beconi M, Aguero A. Hypoosmotic test in equine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 1999, 51: 721-727.
  8. Jeyendran RS, Van der Vent HH, Perez-Pelaez M, Crabo BG, Zaneveld LJD. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J Reprod Fertil 1984, 70: 219-228.
  9. Rota A, Penzo N, Vincenti L, Mantovani R. Hypo-osmotic Swelling (HOS) as a screening assay for testing in vitro fertility of bovine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2000, 53: 1415-1420.
  10. Correa JR, Heersche G, Zavos PM. Sperm membrane functional integrity and response of frozen-thawed bovine spermatozoa during the hypoosmotic swelling test incubation at varying temperatures. Theriogenology 1997, 47: 715-721.
  11. England GCW, Plummer JM. Hypo-osmotic swelling of dog spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1993, 47: 261-270.
  12. Kumi-Diaka J. Subjecting canine semen to the hypo-osmotic test. Theriogenology 1993, 39: 1279-1289.
  13. Royere D, Hamamah S, Nicolle JC, Barthelemy C, Lansac J. Freezing and thawing alter chromatine stability of ejaculated human spermatozoa: fluorescence acridine orange staining and Feulgen-DNA cytophotometric studies. Gamete Res 1988, 21: 51-57.
  14. Tejada RI, Mitchell JC, Norman A, Marik JJ, Friedman S. A test for practical evaluation of male fertility by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence. Fertil Steril 1984, 42: 87-91.
  15. Evenson DP, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed MR. Relation of mammalian sperm chromatin heterogeneity to fertility. Science 1980, 240: 1131-1133.
  16. Evenson DP, Jost L. Sperm chromatin structure assay is useful for fertility assessment. Methods Cell Sci 2000, 22: 169-189.
  17. Penfold LM, Jost L, Evenson DP, Wildt DE. Normospermic versus teratospermic domestic cat sperm chromatin integrity evaluated by flow cytometry and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Biol Reprod 2003, 69: 1730-1735.
  18. Smith FO. Cryopreservation of canine semen, technique and performance. PhD thesis, University of Minnesota (USA), 1984.
  19. Dobrinsky I, Lulai C, Barth AD, Post K. Effects of four different extenders and three different freezing rates on post-thaw viability of dog semen. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1993, 47: 291-296.
  20. Olar TT, Bowen RA, Pickett BW. Influence of extender, cryopreservative and seminal processing procedures on postthaw motility of canine spermatozoa frozen in straws. Theriogenology 1989, 31: 451-461 [CrossRef].
  21. Rota A, Linde-Forsberg C, Vannozzi J, Romagnoli S, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Cryosurvival of dog spermatozoa at different glycerol concentrations and freezing/thawing rates. Reprod Dom Anim 1998, 33: 355-361.
  22. Mohanachandran SR, Kalatharan J, Rajasekaran J. Effect of cryopreservation on the viability and membrane integrity of canine spermatozoa. Indian J Anim Reprod 1999, 20: 142-145.
  23. Wilhelm KM, Graham JK, Squires EL. Comparison of the fertility of cryopreserved stallion spermatozoa with sperm motion analyses, flow cytometric evaluation, and zona-free hamster oocyte penetration. Theriogenology 1996, 46: 559-578 [CrossRef].
  24. Watson PF. Recent developments and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and assessment of their post-thawing function. Reprod Fertil Dev 1995, 871-891.
  25. Rota A, Peña A, Linde-Forsberg C, Rodriguez-Martinez H. In vitro capacitation of fresh, chilled and frozen-thawed dog spermatozoa assessed by the chlortetracycline assay and changes in motility patterns. Anim Reprod Sci 1999, 57: 199-215 [CrossRef].
  26. Iguer-Ouada M, Verstegen JP. Evaluation of the Hamilton Thorne Computer-based Automated System for dog semen analysis. Theriogenology 2001, 55: 733-749.
  27. Hammadeh ME, Greiner S, Rosenbaum P, Schmidt W. Comparison between Human Sperm Preservation Medium and TEST-yolk buffer on protecting chromatin and morphology integrity of human spermatozoa in fertile and subfertile men after freeze-thawing procedure. J Androl 2001, 22: 1012-1018.
  28. Blottner S, Warnke C, Tuchscherer A, Heinen V, Torner H. Morphological and functional changes of stallion spermatozoa after cryopreservation during breeding and non breeding season. Anim Reprod Sci 2001, 65: 75-88.
  29. Evenson DP, Larson K, Jost L. Sperm chromatin structure assay: its clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility and comparison with other techniques. J Androl 2002, 23: 25-43.