Free Access
Reprod. Nutr. Dev.
Volume 45, Number 4, July-August 2005
Page(s) 427 - 440
References of Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 45 427-440
  1. Martin SA, Nisbet DJ. Effect of direct-fed microbials on rumen microbial fermentation. J Dairy Sci 1992, 75: 1736-1744 [PubMed].
  2. Dawes ME, Tyler JW, Hostetler D, Lakritz J, Tessman R. Evaluation of a commercially available immunoassay for assessing adequacy of passive transfer in calves. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002, 220: 791-793 [PubMed].
  3. Davis CL, Drackley JK. The Development, Nutrition and Management of the Young Calf. Iowa State Press, Ames, IA, USA, 1999.
  4. Langford FM, Weary DM, Fisher L. Antibiotic resistance in gut bacteria from dairy calves: A dose response to the level of antibiotics fed in milk. J Dairy Sci 2003, 86: 3963-3966 [PubMed].
  5. Phillips, I, Casewell M, Cox T, De Groot B, Friis C, Jones R, Nightingale C, Preston R, Waddell J. Does the use of antibiotics in food animals pose a risk to human health? A critical review of published data. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004, 53: 28-52 [PubMed].
  6. Mcfarland LV, Bernasconi P. Saccharomyces boulardii: A review of an innovative biotherapeutic agent. Microb Ecol Health Dis 1993, 6: 157-171.
  7. Gedek, BR. Adherence of Escherichia coli serogroup 0 157 and the Salmonella typhimurium mutant DT 104 to the surface of Saccharomyces boulardii. Mycoses 1999, 42: 261-264.
  8. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Fonty G. Establishment of cellulolytic bacteria and development of fermentative activities in the rumen of gnotobiotically-reared lambs receiving the microbial additive Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077. Reprod Nutr Dev 2001, 41: 57-68 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  9. Lesmeister KE, Heinrichs AJ, Gabler MT. Effects of supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture on rumen development, growth characteristics, and blood parameters in neonatal dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 2004, 87: 1832-1839 [PubMed].
  10. Chaucheyras F, Fonty G, Bertin G. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077, a feed additive for ruminants, modulates the establishment of rumen microbial communities and rumen function in lambs. S Afr J Anim Sci 1999, 29: 56-57.
  11. Chaucheyras-Durand F. Fonty G. Influence of a probiotic yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077) on microbial colonization and fermentation in the rumen of newborn lamb. Microb Ecol Health Dis 2002, 14: 30-36 [CrossRef].
  12. Fallon RJ, Harte FJ. The effect of yeast culture inclusion in the concentrate diet on calf performance. J Dairy Sci 1987, 70 (Suppl 1): 119.
  13. Hughes J. The effect of a high-strength yeast culture in the diet of early-weaned calves. Anim Prod 1988, 46: 526.
  14. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th Rev Ed, Natl Acad Sci Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
  15. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, 1990.
  16. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991, 74: 3583-3596 [PubMed].
  17. Williamson DH, Mellanby J, Krebs HA. Enzymatic determination of D(-)BHBA and acetoacetic acid in blood. Biochemistry J 1962, 82: 90-99.
  18. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 1996, 45: 493-496.
  19. NARMS. National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS). CDC/FDA/USDA, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2000.
  20. Berge ACB, Atwill ER, Sischo WW. Assessing antibiotic resistance in fecal Escherichia coli in young calves using cluster analysis techniques. Prev Vet Med 2003, 61: 91-102 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  21. Kuehl R. Complete block designs. In: Kuehl, R. (Ed.) Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis. Wadsworth Publishing Co, Belmont, CA, USA, 1994, p 256-305.
  22. Littell RC, Stroup WW, Freund RJ. SAS for linear models, 4th ed. SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA, 2002.
  23. SAS. SAS/STAT®; User's guide (Release 8.2). SAS Inst Inc, Cary, NC, 2001.
  24. Moore DA, Sischo WM, Festa DM, Reynolds JP, Atwill RE, Holmberg CA. Influence of arrival weight, season and calf supplier on survival in Holstein beef calves on a calf ranch in California, USA. Prev Vet Med 2002, 53: 103-115 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  25. Quigley JD, III, Wallis LB, Dowlen HH, Heitmann RN Sodium bicarbonate and yeast culture effects on ruminal fermentation, growth, and intake in dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 1992, 75: 3531-3538.
  26. Chaucheyras F, Fonty G, Bertin G, Salmon JM, Gouet P. Effects of a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Levucell SC1), a microbial additive for ruminants, on lactate metabolism in vitro. Can J Microbiol 1996, 42: 927-933 [PubMed].
  27. Lynch HA, Martin SA. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture and Saccharomyces cerevisiae live cells on in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation. J Dairy Sci 2002, 85: 2603-2608 [PubMed].
  28. Hammon HM, Schiessler G, Nussbaum A, Blum JW. Feed intake patterns, growth performance, and metabolic and endocrine traits in calves fed unlimited amounts of colostrum and milk by automate, starting in the neonatal period. J Dairy Sci 2002, 85: 3352-3362 [PubMed].
  29. Cole NA, Purdy CW, Hutchenson DP. Influence of yeast culture on feeder calves and lambs. J Anim Sci 1992, 70: 1682-1690 [PubMed].
  30. Sullivan A, Nord CE. The place of probiotics in human intestinal infections. Int J Antimicrobial Agents 2002, 20: 313-319.
  31. Jouglar JY, Durand H, Dussert L. Evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae I-1079 as a potential alternative to antibiotic growth promoters for piglet feeding. In: Proc 16th Intern Pig Vet Soc Cong, Melbourne, Australia, 2000, p 17-20.
  32. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Fonty G, Theveniot M, Gouet P. Fate of Levucell SC I-1077 yeast additive during digestive transit in lambs. Reprod Nutr Dev 1998, 38: 275-280 [PubMed].
  33. Berge ACB, Atwill ER, Sischo WM. Animal and farm influences on the dynamics of antibiotic resistance in faecal Escherichia coli in young dairy calves. Prev Vet Med 2005, 69: 25-38 [CrossRef] [PubMed].