EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 44 / No 5 (September-October 2004) Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 44 5 (2004) 397-405 References
Free Access
Issue
Reprod. Nutr. Dev.
Volume 44, Number 5, September-October 2004
Page(s) 397 - 405
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2004046
References of Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 44 397-405
  1. Church DC, Pond WG. Fundamentos de Nutrición y Alimentación de Animales. Editorial Limusa, S.A. de C.V., Grupo Noruega Editores, México, 1998.
  2. Hirsh DC. Relation of normal microflora to structures and functions of the gastrointestinal tract. In: Anderson NV (Ed), Veterinary Gastroenterology, Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1980, p 207.
  3. Mikolajcik EM, Hamdan IY. Lactobacillus acidophilus. II. Antimicrobial agents. Cult Dairy Prod J 1975, 12: 8.
  4. Havenaar R, Ten Brink B, Huis in't Veld JHJ. Selection of strains for probiotic use. In: Fuller R (Ed), Probiotics: The Scientific Basis, 1st ed, Chapman & Hall, London, 1992, p 209-221.
  5. Fuller R (Ed). Probiotics: The scientific basis. Chapman & Hall, ltd., London, 1992.
  6. Lema M, Williams L, Rao DR. Reduction of fecal shedding of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in lambs by feeding microbial feed supplement. Small Rumin Res 2001, 39: 31-39.
  7. Umberger SH, Notter DR, Webb KE, McClure WH. Evaluation of a Lactobacillus acidophilus inoculant on feedlot lamb performance. Anim Sci Res Rep, Virginia Agric Exp Stat Virginia Poly 1989, 8: 40-45.
  8. Gusils C, Pérez Chaia A, González S, Oliver G. Lactobacilli isolated from chicken intestines: Potential use as probiotics. J Food Protect 1999, 62: 252-256.
  9. Gusils C, Bujazha M, González S. Preliminary studies to design a probiotic for use in swine feed. Interciencia 2002, 27: 409-413.
  10. Abe F, Ishibashi N, Shimamura S. Effect of administration of bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria to newborn calves and piglets. J Dairy Sci 1995, 78(12): 2838-2846.
  11. Draksler D, Monferrán MC, González S, Oliver G. Ovicidal activity of lactic acid bacteria on the intestinal nematode eggs obtained from goats. In: Research Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Gnotobiology and Diseases of Young (Ed), The Prospects of probiotics in prevention and therapy of diseases of young, Proc. International Probiotic Conference, 2000, p 44.
  12. Audisio MC. Estudio de bacterias lácticas con actividad antipatógena para el diseño de suplementos probióticos para aves. Doctoral thesis, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Argentina, 1999.
  13. Newman KE, Dawson KA, Morehead MC. Antagonistic activities of bacterial isolates from probiotic feed supplements upon pathogenic and rumen bacteria. J Anim Sci 1990, 68 (Suppl 1): 505.
  14. Ozawa K, Yabu-uchi K, Yamanaka K, Yamashita Y, Nomura S, Oku I. Effect of Streptococcus faecalis BIO-4R on intestinal flora of weanling piglets and calves. Appl Environ Microbiol 1983, 45: 1513-1518 [PubMed].
  15. Tournut J. Applications of probiotics to animal husbandry. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 1989, 8: 551-556.
  16. Weinberg ZG, Muck RE, Weimer PJ. The survival of silage inoculant lactic acid bacteria in rumen fluid. J Appl Microbiol 2003, 94: 1066-1071.
  17. Salminen S, Isolauri E, Salminen E. Clinical uses of probiotics for stabilizing the gut mucosal barrier: successful strains and future challenges. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1998, 70: 347-358.
  18. Bergey's Manual of determinative bacteriology, 9th ed, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1989.
  19. Raibaud P, Caulet M, Galpin J V, Mocquot G. Studies on the bacterial flora of the tract alimentary of pigs. II. Streptococci: selective enumeration and differentiation of the dominant groups. J Appl Bacteriol 1961, 24: 285-291.
  20. Jonsson P, Wadström T. Cell surface hydrophobicity of Staphylococcus aureus measured by the salt aggregation test (SAT). Curr Microbiol 1984, 10: 203-210.
  21. Tagg JR, McGiven AR. Assay system for bacteriocins. Appl Microbiol 1971, 21: 943.
  22. Doyle RJ, Rosenberg M (Eds). Microbial Cell Surface Hydrophobicity. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, 1990.
  23. Rosenberg M, Gutnick D, Rosenberg E. Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: A simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1980, 9: 28-33.
  24. Locascio MM. Bífidobacterias: ecología, fisiología y comportamiento inmunológico. Doctoral thesis, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Argentina, 1998.
  25. Gilliland SE, Speck ML. Enumeration and identity of lactobacilli in dietary products. J Food Prot 1977, 40: 760.
  26. Mitchell SL, Gilliland SE. Pepsinized sweet whey medium for growing Lactobacillus acidophilus for frozen concentrated cultures. J Dairy Sci 1983, 66: 712-718.
  27. Gilliland SE, Staley TE, Bush LJ. Importance of bile tolerance of Lactobacillus acidophilus used as dietary adjunct. J Dairy Sci 1984, 67: 30-45.
  28. Goldin BR, Gorbach SL. Probiotics for humans. In: Fuller R (Ed), Probiotics: The Scientific Basis, 1st ed, Chapman & Hall, London, 1992, p 355-376.
  29. Gusils C, González S, Oliver G. Some probiotic properties of chicken lactobacilli. Can J Microbiol 1999, 45: 981-987.
  30. Nousiainen J, Setälä J. Lactic Acid Bacteria as Animal Probiotics. In: Salminen S, von Wright A (Eds), Lactic Acid Bacteria. Microbiology and Functional Aspects, New York, 1998, p 437-473.
  31. Morata de Ambrosini VI, González S, Perdigón G, Pesce de Ruiz Holgado A, Oliver G. Immunostimulating activity of cell walls from lactic acid bacteria and related species. Food Agric Immunol 1998, 10: 183-191.
  32. Morata de Ambrosini VI. Estudio estructural y de la composición química de la pared celular de bacterias lácticas. Implicancias en la activación del sistema inmunitario. Doctoral thesis, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Argentina, 1995.
  33. Vanhaecke E, Pijck J. Bioluminescence assay for measuring the number of bacteria adhering to the hydrocarbon phase in the BATH test. Appl Environ Microbiol 1988, 54: 1436-1439.
  34. Ofek I, Doyle RJ. Bacterial Adhesion to Cells and Tissues. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1994.