The impact of sperm motility on non-return rate in preselected dairy bulls
Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 34 1 (1994) 37-45
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Predictive Indicators of Cryotolerance and Fertility in Bovine Sperm: Evaluating Fresh Semen Quality to Improve AI Outcomes With Frozen–Thawed Sperm
Carolina Tamargo, Ferran Garriga, Marc Yeste, Elisabeth Pinart, Rodrigo Muiño, María Teresa Carbajo and Carlos Olegario HidalgoReproduction in Domestic Animals 59 (11) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.14742
Spermatological Parameters In Vitro of Holstein Bulls and Relationship with Male Fertility
Halil Dönmez and Muhammed Enes İnançActa Scientiae Veterinariae 52 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.140919
Use of alternative diluent ACP-Lact® and coconut water powder (ACP) in cryopreservation of goat semen and fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) in half-breed goats
Leonardo Alves Rodrigues Cabral, Wallisson Bruno de Morais Pacheco, Suane Silva Alves dos Santos, Adriano da Silva Prado, Luis Alberto Linhares Rufino, Cristiane Clemente de Mello Salgueiro, Ney Rômulo de Oliveira Paula, Assis Rubens Montenegro and José Ferreira NunesAnimal Reproduction 20 (3) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-ar2023-0081
Seasonal variation in bull semen quality demonstrates there are heat-sensitive and heat-tolerant bulls
Jacob K. Netherton, Benjamin R. Robinson, Rachel A. Ogle, Allan Gunn, Ana Izabel S. Balbin Villaverde, Kim Colyvas, Ced Wise, Tylah Russo, Amiee Dowdell and Mark A. BakerScientific Reports 12 (1) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17708-9
Fertility comparison of frozen bull semen stored in cryogenic deep freezer (−152 °C) and LN2 container
Mehmet Borga Tırpan, Kemal Tuna Olğaç, Fırat Korkmaz, Ali Sonat, Ufuk Kaya and Ergun AkçayTheriogenology 185 1 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.03.017
Differences in sperm functionality and intracellular metabolites in Norwegian Red bulls of contrasting fertility
Birgitte Narud, Geir Klinkenberg, Abdolrahman Khezri, Teklu Tewoldebrhan Zeremichael, Else-Berit Stenseth, Anna Nordborg, Tonje Husby Haukaas, Jane M. Morrell, Bjørg Heringstad, Frøydis Deinboll Myromslien and Elisabeth KommisrudTheriogenology 157 24 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.07.005
In vitro evaluation of cryopreserved bovine sperm and its relation to field fertility in fixed‐time artificial insemination
Denise S. Okano, Jurandy M. Penitente‐Filho, Victor E. Gomez León, Paula P. Maitan, Camila O. Silveira, Bruna Waddington, Edgar A. Díaz‐Miranda, Eduardo P. da Costa, Simone E. F. Guimarães and José D. GuimarãesReproduction in Domestic Animals 54 (3) 604 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13401
CASA-Mot in mammals: an update
J. L. Yániz, M. A. Silvestre, P. Santolaria and C. SolerReproduction, Fertility and Development 30 (6) 799 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1071/RD17432
Sperm viability, reactive oxygen species, and DNA fragmentation index combined can discriminate between above- and below-average fertility bulls
A. Kumaresan, Anders Johannisson, Essraa M. Al-Essawe and Jane M. MorrellJournal of Dairy Science 100 (7) 5824 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12484
Differential abundances of four forms of Binder of SPerm 1 in the seminal plasma of Bos taurus indicus bulls with different patterns of semen freezability
Marcos Jorge Magalhães, Leonardo Franco Martins, Renato Lima Senra, et al.Theriogenology 86 (3) 766 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.02.030
Liposome-based semen extender is suitable alternative to egg yolk-based extender for cryopreservation of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) semen
Pradeep Kumar, Monika Saini, Dharmendra Kumar, et al.Animal Reproduction Science 159 38 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.05.010
Relationship among seminal quality measures and field fertility of young dairy bulls using low-dose inseminations
P. Christensen, R. Labouriau, A. Birck, et al.Journal of Dairy Science 94 (4) 1744 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3087
Spermatozoal transcriptome profiling for bull sperm motility: a potential tool to evaluate semen quality
N. Bissonnette, J.-P. Levesque-Sergerie, C. Thibault and G. BoissonneaultReproduction 138 (1) 65 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-08-0503
Analysing Motility Parameters on Fresh Bull Semen Could Help to Predict Resistance to Freezing: A Preliminary Study
L Defoin, A Granados and I DonnayReproduction in Domestic Animals 43 (5) 606 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.00964.x
Identification of sperm subpopulations with defined motility characteristics in ejaculates from Holstein bulls: Effects of cryopreservation and between-bull variation
R. Muiño, C. Tamargo, C.O. Hidalgo and A.I. PeñaAnimal Reproduction Science 109 (1-4) 27 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.10.007
Associação entre o perfil andrológico e a congelação de sêmen de touros da raça Nelore aos dois anos de idade, pré-selecionados pela classificação andrológica por pontos (CAP)
D.F. Salvador, V.J. Andrade, V.R. Vale Filho, J.C. Dias and L.A.G. NogueiraArquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 60 (3) 587 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352008000300010
Genetic Parameters for Semen Production Traits in Austrian Dual‐Purpose Simmental Bulls
B Gredler, C Fuerst, B Fuerst‐Waltl, H Schwarzenbacher and J SölknerReproduction in Domestic Animals 42 (3) 326 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00778.x
Relationship between bovine fertility and the number of spermatozoa penetrating the cervical mucus within straws
Muzaffer Taş, Suleyman Bacinoglu, Ümüt Cirit, Özen Banu Özdaş and Kemal AkAnimal Reproduction Science 101 (1-2) 18 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.08.020
State of the art in farm animal sperm evaluation
H. Rodríguez-MartínezReproduction, Fertility and Development 19 (1) 91 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1071/RD06104
Estimation of the potential fertility based upon non-return rates of bulls: Using polyacrylamide gel instead of cervical mucus in the sperm penetration test
M. Taş, S. Bacinoglu, Ü. Cirit, et al.Theriogenology 68 (7) 981 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.07.011
Can We Increase the Estimative Value of Semen Assessment?*
H Rodríguez‐MartínezReproduction in Domestic Animals 41 (s2) 2 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00764.x
Semen and reproductive profiles of genetically identical cloned bulls
R. Tayfur Tecirlioglu, Melissa A. Cooney, Natasha A. Korfiatis, et al.Theriogenology 65 (9) 1783 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.033
Factors Affecting Pregnancy Rate in Artificial Insemination with Frozen Semen During Non‐Breeding Season in Murciano–Granadina Goats: a Field Assay
I Salvador, MP Viudes‐de‐Castro, J Bernacer, EA Gómez and MA SilvestreReproduction in Domestic Animals 40 (6) 526 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2005.00624.x
Relationship Between Sperm Viability as Determined by Flow Cytometry and Nonreturn Rate of Dairy Bulls
Preben Christensen, Dorothee Boelling, Kurt Myrup Pedersen, Inge Riis Korsgaard and Just JensenJournal of Andrology 26 (1) 98 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2005.tb02878.x
Intra‐uterine Insemination in Farm Animals and Humans
S Verberckmoes, A Van Soom and A de KruifReproduction in Domestic Animals 39 (3) 195 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2004.00512.x
Does cleansing of frozen-thawed bull semen before assessment provide samples that relate better to potential fertility?
Triin Hallap, Margareta Håård, Ülle Jaakma, Birgitta Larsson and Heriberto Rodriguez-MartinezTheriogenology 62 (3-4) 702 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.11.017
Bull semen in vitro fertility after cryopreservation using egg yolk LDL: a comparison with Optidyl®, a commercial egg yolk extender
Lamia Amirat, Daniel Tainturier, Laëtitia Jeanneau, et al.Theriogenology 61 (5) 895 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00259-0
Laboratory Semen Assessment and Prediction of Fertility: still Utopia?*
H Rodríguez‐MartínezReproduction in Domestic Animals 38 (4) 312 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2003.00436.x
Semen characteristics of genetically identical quadruplet bulls
Carl Lessard, Isabelle Masseau, Jean-François Bilodeau, et al.Theriogenology 59 (8) 1865 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01256-6
Adjusting the number of spermatozoa in mini-straws by determination of the operative volume of bovine semen
Pascal DumontTheriogenology 57 (6) 1743 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)00681-7
Sperm Binding to Epithelial Oviduct Explants in Bulls with Different Nonreturn Rates Investigated with a New In Vitro Model1
Ingrid M.C. De Pauw, Ann Van Soom, Hans Laevens, Steven Verberckmoes and Aart de KruifBiology of Reproduction 67 (4) 1073 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod67.4.1073
The Relationship between Semen Quality and the Nonreturn Rate of Bulls
P Christensen, PB Brockhoff and H Lehn-JensenReproduction in Domestic Animals 34 (6) 503 (1999)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.1999.tb01410.x
The Use of Two Fluorescent Dyes to Identify Sperm in a Competitive Binding Assay to Oocytes
DAVID J. MILLER, JILL M. DEMERS, ANDREA G. BRAUNDMEEER and MELISSA L. BEHRENSJournal of Andrology 19 (6) 650 (1998)
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1998.tb02074.x
Effects of culling for male fertility in a dairy cattle population
Eva-Marie Stålhammar, Erling Strandberg and Jan PhilipssonLivestock Production Science 47 (3) 211 (1997)
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(96)01407-8